<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Search of a City: So Long City Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.downtowncolumbus.com/rightnow/2009/02/in-search-of-a-city-so-long-city-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.downtowncolumbus.com/rightnow/2009/02/in-search-of-a-city-so-long-city-center/</link>
	<description>News and events about Downtown Columbus!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:44:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walker Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.downtowncolumbus.com/rightnow/2009/02/in-search-of-a-city-so-long-city-center/comment-page-1/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>Walker Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.downtowncolumbus.com/rightnow/?p=610#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>I had originally hoped that the building could have been salvaged and &quot;turned inside out&quot; to make it more outward-facing and pedestrian-oriented, but I completely understand the decision to go the more economically feasible route and knock it down instead. The building was never really meant to function as anything other than a big enclosed suburban-style mall.

Anyway, the 9-acre park is a better short-term solution than a big empty abandoned zombie mall. 

And the longer-term mixed-use development is pretty much what I wanted to see come out of a re-use of the space anyway, so I&#039;m happy that the ball is starting to get rolling. 

I totally agree that this type of redevelopment is best when organic and entrepreneurial. Downtown has come a long way in the past 10 years, and I can&#039;t wait to see where we are in another 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had originally hoped that the building could have been salvaged and &#8220;turned inside out&#8221; to make it more outward-facing and pedestrian-oriented, but I completely understand the decision to go the more economically feasible route and knock it down instead. The building was never really meant to function as anything other than a big enclosed suburban-style mall.</p>
<p>Anyway, the 9-acre park is a better short-term solution than a big empty abandoned zombie mall. </p>
<p>And the longer-term mixed-use development is pretty much what I wanted to see come out of a re-use of the space anyway, so I&#8217;m happy that the ball is starting to get rolling. </p>
<p>I totally agree that this type of redevelopment is best when organic and entrepreneurial. Downtown has come a long way in the past 10 years, and I can&#8217;t wait to see where we are in another 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
